The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OWLT · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ZIVO · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | OWLT | ONC | ZIVO | VASO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 53 (highest) | 53 (highest) | 53 (highest) | 52 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 44 | 75 | 70 | 77 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 67 | 94 (highest) | 44 | 94 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 4 | — | 27 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 69 (highest) | 55 | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 24 | 44 (highest) | 36 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | 37% below high estimate |
| Market cap | $152.0M | $447.6B | $14.8M | $33.4M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2025 |