The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PK · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PK | DXYN | LVO | XWEL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 35 | 35 | 60 (highest) | 53 |
| Pricing power | — | 34 (highest) | 5 | 11 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 4 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 0 | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 58 (highest) | 44 | 24 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 170% above high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $3.0B | — | $65.9M | $6.7M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |