The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MALG · Consumer Staples · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
COKE · Consumer Staples · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PM | MALG | BRBR | COKE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 74 | 77 (highest) | 75 | 74 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 75 | 75 | 95 (highest) | — |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 92 | 55 | 59 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | — | 100 (highest) | 86 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 38 | 100 (highest) | 26 | 70 |
| Capital discipline | 59 | 41 | 100 (highest) | 80 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 55% below high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | Not reported | Not reported | $1.5B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2021 | FY2025 | FY2025 |