The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PNXP · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LGL · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PNXP | GUER | SABR | LGL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 70 (highest) | 60 | 47 |
| Pricing power | 91 | 97 (highest) | 75 | — |
| Returns on capital | — | 0 | 13 (highest) | 9 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 28 | 40 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 44 | 51 (highest) | 34 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | 762% above high estimate |
| Market cap | — | $29.5M | $679.4M | $41.4M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |