The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PRG · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PRG | OMCL | CIEN | TWLO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 58 | 91 (highest) | 81 | 75 |
| Pricing power | — | 75 | 72 | 84 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 68 (highest) | 0 | 33 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 43 | 100 (highest) | 37 | 88 |
| Capital discipline | 48 (highest) | 6 | 48 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | Around the high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 307% above high estimate | 2423% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | $1.8B | $2.0B | $53.4B | $31.3B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |