The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PRKR · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
INVU · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PRKR | INVU | PINS | APPF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 (highest) | 53 | 78 | 79 |
| Pricing power | 70 | 86 | 94 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | — | 5 | 14 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 78 | 55 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 62 (highest) | 44 | 28 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 694% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | 2485% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $15.7M | $49.9M | — | $6.5B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |