The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PRKS · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CCOI · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | PRKS | CCOI | SPOK | WBD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) | 50 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 | 58 | 23 | 75 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 81 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 49 | 90 (highest) | 4 | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 2 | 0 | 100 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital discipline | 80 (highest) | 24 | 27 | 70 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 204% above high estimate | 24% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 161% above high estimate |
| Market cap | — | $620.8M | $219.5M | $64.1B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |