The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
NPHC · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PROF | WRBY | NPHC | ELSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 75 | 82 (highest) | 70 | 49 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 94 | 62 | 88 |
| Returns on capital | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | — | 0 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 55 | 28 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 24 | 44 (highest) | 16 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | 632% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $247.2M | $3.1B | $2.1M | $26.8M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |