The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PTEN · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PTEN | EU | YHGJ | XMAX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 22 (highest) | 22 (highest) | 22 (highest) | 21 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 42 | 57 (highest) | 23 | 21 |
| Pricing power | — | 3 | 14 (highest) | 6 |
| Returns on capital | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 28 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 24 | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $3.8B | $221.1M | $7.5M | $354.8M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |