The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

PTGX · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

FOCL · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

CATX · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

TCRX · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasurePTGXFOCLCATXTCRX
Moat Score (0–100)35 (highest)35 (highest)35 (highest)35 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0
Business trend58 (highest)3341
Pricing power72 (highest)41
Returns on capital4 (highest)000
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)2855 (highest)55 (highest)
Capital discipline2444 (highest)44 (highest)44 (highest)
Price vs. high estimateNo price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$8.7B$212.9M$221.5M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025