The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
QMCO · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | QMCO | ALGM | HTCR | ALKT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 21 | 44 | 64 (highest) | 63 |
| Pricing power | 65 | 70 | 47 | 83 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 28 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 36 (highest) | 28 | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 20 | 60 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 589% above high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $167.8M | $9.1B | $62.5M | $1.8B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |