The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
QTI · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | QTI | SRTS | ZOMDF | TXG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 46 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 (highest) | 54 | 55 | 60 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 47 | 90 | 100 (highest) | 93 |
| Returns on capital | — | 11 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 2% below high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $36.8M | $50.0M | — | $6.0B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |