The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
QTTB · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | QTTB | PAHC | TRLV | USAQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 65 | 66 | 57 | 85 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 56 | 88 (highest) | 72 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 62 (highest) | 12 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 30 | 56 | 55 |
| Capital discipline | 24 (highest) | 22 | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $193.4M | — | $1.7B | $4.0M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |