The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MGSD · Industrials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
DTI · Industrials · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RBC | BWXT | MGSD | DTI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 63 | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 63 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 100 (highest) | 80 | 70 | 44 |
| Pricing power | 64 | 41 | 70 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 13 | 87 | — | 88 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 80 (highest) | 32 | 73 | — |
| Capital discipline | 60 | 77 (highest) | 42 | 20 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 351% above high estimate | 214% above high estimate | No price data | 21% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $19.5B | $16.0B | $1.3M | $82.4M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |