The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RBRK · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
RPD · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RBRK | APG | CCSI | RPD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 56 (highest) | 56 (highest) | 56 (highest) | 56 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 57 | 57 | 39 | 72 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 96 | 29 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 35 | 100 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 100 (highest) | 21 | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 60 (highest) | 20 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 313% above high estimate | 26% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | $15.4B | $17.0B | $695.8M | $786.9M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |