The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RGS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RGS | LE | FLL | ATRO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 34 | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 34 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 36 | 29 | 49 | 75 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 68 | 100 (highest) | 18 |
| Returns on capital | 5 (highest) | 5 (highest) | 0 | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 16 | 0 | 56 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 69 (highest) | 54 | 24 | 20 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 426% above high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $72.2M | $364.1M | $87.1M | — |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |