The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RJET · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RJET | BXC | LFUS | KN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 46 | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 46 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 86 (highest) | 62 | 58 | 26 |
| Pricing power | — | 15 | 63 (highest) | 63 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 7 | 63 (highest) | 34 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 13 | 55 | 36 | 84 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 80 (highest) | 40 | 43 | 59 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 14% above high estimate | 24% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | 460% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $816.0M | $446.3M | — | $3.0B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |