The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RMNI · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RMNI | SCDA | LOGI | CSCO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 72 (highest) | 72 (highest) | 72 (highest) | 72 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 69 | 100 (highest) | 78 | 61 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 95 | 63 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 88 | 100 (highest) | 96 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 74 | 55 | 100 (highest) | 47 |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 24 | 20 | 56 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 46% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 403% above high estimate | No price data | 269% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $423.2M | $9.5M | — | $438.4B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2015 | FY2026 | FY2025 |