The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
YBGJ · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RNXT | YBGJ | XTNT | IDXG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 (highest) | 30 | 70 (highest) | 39 |
| Pricing power | 77 | 87 | 96 (highest) | 73 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | — | 0 | 9 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 55 | 55 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | 76% below high estimate |
| Market cap | $31.6M | $2.5M | $63.0M | $6.6M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |