The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ROC · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
HNIT · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ROC | HNIT | MRVL | SLP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | 20 | 76 (highest) | 64 |
| Pricing power | 94 | 100 (highest) | 78 | 92 |
| Returns on capital | — | — | 0 | 33 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 | 56 (highest) | 55 |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 42 | 60 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | 147% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $74.1M | $445.4M | $165.2B | $366.7M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |