The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RPC · Other · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SNEX · Other · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ALTI · Other · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RPC | SNEX | ALTI | DXR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 39 | 44 (highest) | 40 | 38 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 (highest) | 46 | 60 | 0 |
| Pricing power | — | 70 | — | 91 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 10 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 4 | — | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 74 (highest) | 60 | 44 | 45 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 37% above high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | — | $3.7B | — | $45.8M |
| Moat tier | No moat | Shallow moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2011 |