The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RJET · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SCSC | TEX | IVFH | RJET |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 63 | 71 | 44 | 95 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 25 | 30 | 39 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 10 | 85 (highest) | 37 | 7 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 75 | 29 | 100 (highest) | 13 |
| Capital discipline | 70 | 29 | 24 | 80 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 14% above high estimate | 138% above high estimate | No price data | 10% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $1.2B | $7.9B | $14.2M | $790M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |