The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SHIM · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

AAL · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SGLA · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

TPCS · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureSHIMAALSGLATPCS
Moat Score (0–100)18 (highest)18 (highest)18 (highest)18 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0
Business trend2069 (highest)34
Pricing power004 (highest)
Returns on capital304 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety28 (highest)028 (highest)4
Capital discipline24044 (highest)44 (highest)
Price vs. high estimateNo price data608% above high estimateNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$131.9M$10.0B$485.4M$46.4M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2026