The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CON · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SILO | CON | PETV | LNSR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 65 (highest) | 52 | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 70 (highest) | — | 70 (highest) | 62 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 87 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 7 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 19 | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 103% above high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $62.6M | $4.0B | $27.6M | $69.0M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |