The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SLB · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SLB | ELF | AMPY | WLY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 58 (highest) | 58 (highest) | 58 (highest) | 58 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 47 | 77 (highest) | 51 | 57 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 96 | 100 (highest) | 98 |
| Returns on capital | 20 | 20 | 16 | 25 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | — | 51 | 100 (highest) | 46 |
| Capital discipline | 65 (highest) | 47 | 24 | 64 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 44% above high estimate | 409% above high estimate | 67% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | $69.4B | $4.7B | $160.0M | — |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 |