The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SNBH · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
WGO · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
CTRN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SNBH | WGO | CTRN | DLTI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | 82 (highest) | 47 | 46 |
| Pricing power | 70 (highest) | 17 | — | 60 |
| Returns on capital | — | 64 (highest) | 34 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 13 | 51 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 39 | 40 | 53 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 847% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | $1.2M | — | $547.9M | $24.4M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2023 |