The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

STEK · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

IR · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

CAH · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

FLOC · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureSTEKIRCAHFLOC
Moat Score (0–100)5051 (highest)5050
Methodology versionmoat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0
Business trend3275 (highest)68
Pricing power98 (highest)62130
Returns on capital454100 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety28325662 (highest)
Capital discipline4480 (highest)6239
Price vs. high estimateNo price data197% above high estimate388% above high estimate176% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate)
Market cap$42598$31.4B$53.9B$1.8B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025