The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
STKS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | STKS | ALDS | RIVN | AZIO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 58 | 70 (highest) | 70 (highest) | 58 |
| Pricing power | — | 0 | 0 | 10 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 14 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 10% above high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $57.5M | $160.2M | $21.4B | $13.9M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |