The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
STWI · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | STWI | RSSS | TRU | PUBM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | 54 | 93 (highest) | 60 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 26 | 100 (highest) | 96 |
| Returns on capital | — | 83 (highest) | 6 | 30 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 100 (highest) | 18 | 55 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 24 | 69 (highest) | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 67% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 107% above high estimate |
| Market cap | — | $71.5M | $15.2B | $615.3M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |