The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CHH · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TDG | TJX | DRI | CHH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 78 (highest) | 78 (highest) | 78 (highest) | 77 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 100 (highest) | 91 | 94 | 95 |
| Pricing power | 93 (highest) | 47 | 31 | — |
| Returns on capital | 75 | 100 (highest) | 97 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 40 | 78 (highest) | 72 | 12 |
| Capital discipline | 80 | 74 | 94 | 100 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 112% above high estimate | 21% above high estimate | 6% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | Not reported | $170.7B | $22.4B | $5.1B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 |