The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TLSI · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SHC · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TLSI | SHC | COO | LHX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 63 | 69 | 88 (highest) | 81 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 92 | 100 (highest) | 39 |
| Returns on capital | — | 12 (highest) | 0 | 9 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | — | 36 | 59 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 44 | 46 | 80 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 99% above high estimate | 98% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $215.5M | — | $14.0B | $52.4B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |