The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TOGI · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TOGI | QXL | IZEA | SKKY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 62 | 50 | 53 | 65 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 39 | 70 | 73 | 97 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 7 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 35 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | 7054% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $4.4M | $52.1M | $60.1M | $26.0M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |