The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

TSSI · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

NROM · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

NRC · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ICFI · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

On the watchlist

MeasureTSSINROMNRCICFI
Moat Score (0–100)5455 (highest)55 (highest)54
Methodology versionmoat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0
Business trend834985 (highest)85 (highest)
Pricing power1063 (highest)
Returns on capital100 (highest)100 (highest)14
Balance-sheet safety100 (highest)403035
Capital discipline2430475 (highest)
Price vs. high estimate16359% above high estimate143% above high estimate41% above high estimate35% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate)
Market cap$250.5M$13.8M$484.7M$1.4B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025