The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TXT · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
VSXY · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | TXT | VSXY | FLYE | JOUT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 55 | 56 (highest) | 56 (highest) | 55 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 63 (highest) | 44 | 46 | 45 |
| Pricing power | 24 | 51 | 69 (highest) | 63 |
| Returns on capital | — | 77 | 88 (highest) | 70 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 78 (highest) | 47 | 55 | 55 |
| Capital discipline | 57 | 62 (highest) | 24 | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 3% below high estimate | 157% above high estimate | 41% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | $15.8B | $7.0B | $9.1M | — |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |