The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
UGI · Utilities · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SENR · Utilities · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | UGI | OGE | SENR | KNTK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 37 | 38 (highest) | 37 | 37 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 51 | 50 | 60 | 80 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 86 (highest) | 73 | 23 |
| Returns on capital | 29 (highest) | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 5 | 2 | 28 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital discipline | 63 | 44 | 24 | 80 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 91% above high estimate | No price data | 62% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | — | $10.0B | $1.3M | $3.2B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2025 |