The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
UTI · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | UTI | MAMO | MNRO | TDUP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 67 (highest) | 20 | 39 | 60 |
| Pricing power | — | 40 | 60 | 95 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 11 | 91 (highest) | 13 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 87 (highest) | 73 | 86 | 55 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 12 | 36 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 343% above high estimate | 19% above high estimate | 41% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | $2.1B | $39.1M | $504.1M | $837.1M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |