The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
VIA · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
DOMO · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | VIA | BLKB | DOMO | BRZE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 | 80 (highest) | 67 | 63 |
| Pricing power | 68 | 90 | 91 | 99 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 4 (highest) | — | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 4 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 85 (highest) | 24 | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 11% above high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | — | $1.5B | $141.8M | $3.0B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 |