The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
VOYG · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ONMD · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | VOYG | CHGG | ONMD | HZO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 (highest) | 30 | 48 | 57 |
| Pricing power | 25 | 91 (highest) | 0 | 39 |
| Returns on capital | — | 11 | — | 23 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 55 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital discipline | 34 | 24 | 44 | 64 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 78% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | 39% below high estimate |
| Market cap | $1.0B | $96.9M | $35.3M | $742.9M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |