The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
VRM · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | VRM | UFI | BA | SIF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 11 | 15 (highest) | 15 (highest) | 14 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 36 | 43 (highest) | 34 |
| Pricing power | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 11 (highest) | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | — | 0 | 0 | 7 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 38 (highest) | 20 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $12.9M | $113.1M | $212.0B | $142.2M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |