The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

VSTS · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

NNBR · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SGLY · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

HYFM · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureVSTSNNBRSGLYHYFM
Moat Score (0–100)1516 (highest)1515
Methodology versionmoat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0
Business trend3840 (highest)1820
Pricing power02 (highest)
Returns on capital306 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety0028 (highest)28 (highest)
Capital discipline1924 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)
Price vs. high estimate36% above high estimateNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$2.1B$174.7M$1.1M$3.2M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025