The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
WDAY · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | WDAY | UMAC | AMPG | WSC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 78 (highest) | 70 | 54 | 60 |
| Pricing power | — | 41 | 50 | 69 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 7 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 44 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 40 |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 40 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | 19% above high estimate |
| Market cap | — | $656.3M | $128.6M | $4.7B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |