The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
WH · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | WH | PLBY | UAVS | MSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 57 | 22 | 57 | 78 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 86 (highest) | 51 | 35 |
| Returns on capital | 47 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 2 | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 37 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 37 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | — | $136.5M | $32.0M | — |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |