The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
WK · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ROC · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | WK | ROC | SLP | TBCH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 53 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 63 | 50 | 64 | 83 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 99 (highest) | 94 | 92 | 43 |
| Returns on capital | — | — | 33 | 74 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 55 (highest) | 42 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 147% above high estimate | 38% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $3.2B | $74.1M | $366.7M | $249.0M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |