The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
WTI · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | WTI | ASPI | SCL | ECVT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 31 (highest) | 31 (highest) | 31 (highest) | 31 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 25 | 50 | 52 (highest) | 45 |
| Pricing power | — | 27 | 15 | 40 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 59 (highest) | 0 | 47 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 10 | 55 (highest) | 23 | 36 |
| Capital discipline | 31 | 24 | 18 | 34 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 133% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 360% above high estimate |
| Market cap | — | $434.4M | $1.3B | $1.4B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |