The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
WWD · Industrials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | WWD | FELE | MHO | POOL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 73 (highest) | 73 (highest) | 73 (highest) | 73 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 95 (highest) | 62 | 64 | 35 |
| Pricing power | 43 | 60 (highest) | 33 | 52 |
| Returns on capital | — | 69 | 97 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 | 97 | 100 (highest) | 76 |
| Capital discipline | 80 | 77 | 72 | 99 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 364% above high estimate | 33% above high estimate | 55% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 29% below high estimate |
| Market cap | $25.1B | $4.7B | $3.9B | $6.7B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |