The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
XPOF · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
WNLV · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
FWONA · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | XPOF | WNLV | FWONA | CLUS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 65 (highest) | 28 | 50 | 20 |
| Pricing power | — | 41 (highest) | — | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 7 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 28 | 1 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 24 | — | 46 (highest) | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $226.2M | $110994 | — | — |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |