The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
YHC · Consumer Staples · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
BRID · Consumer Staples · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | YHC | BRID | BOF | SOWG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 26 | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) | 26 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | — | 63 (highest) | 51 |
| Pricing power | 0 | 31 (highest) | 0 | 8 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 6 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 | 28 |
| Capital discipline | — | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $39.7M | $58.3M | $53.9M | $42.2M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |