The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
YORW · Utilities · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | YORW | RENX | CLNE | OPTT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 78 (highest) | 70 | 52 | 63 |
| Pricing power | — | 9 | 60 (highest) | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 12 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 2 | 28 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 39 | 60 (highest) | 24 | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 62% above high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $451.6M | $1.8M | $476.0M | $32.8M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |