The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ZCAR · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
FWRG · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ZCAR | FWRG | BWMG | AMCR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 29 | 30 (highest) | 29 | 29 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 39 | 75 (highest) | 59 | 51 |
| Pricing power | 6 | — | 35 | 36 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 0 | 0 | 33 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 20 | 28 (highest) | 1 |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 253% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | 893% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $899513 | $742.4M | $1.6M | $99.7B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |