The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

ZIVO · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

DARE · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ONC · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

OWLT · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureZIVODAREONCOWLT
Moat Score (0–100)53 (highest)53 (highest)53 (highest)53 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0
Business trend703775 (highest)44
Pricing power447794 (highest)67
Returns on capital4
Balance-sheet safety555569 (highest)55
Capital discipline44 (highest)44 (highest)2444 (highest)
Price vs. high estimateNo price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$14.8M$19.4M$447.6B$152.0M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filings as ofFY2024FY2025FY2025FY2025
ZIVO vs DARE vs ONC vs OWLT — Moat Score Comparison · Buy Like Buffett